Comparing Audio File and Multitrack Session Workflows

Audio editing and mixing can be accomplished in two primary ways: using individual audio files or using a multitrack session. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages, making the choice of method dependent on the specific project and the desired outcome.

Audio File Workflow

In an audio file workflow, each sound element is treated as a separate file. This approach is suitable for simple projects with limited tracks and minimal mixing requirements. The workflow is straightforward, as it primarily involves editing and processing individual audio files. This method is efficient for tasks like adding effects, trimming, or adjusting levels.

Advantages of Audio File Workflow:

  • Simple and straightforward: Editing and processing individual audio files is relatively easy, making it suitable for beginners or projects with limited complexity.
  • Efficient for basic tasks: Audio file workflow is effective for tasks like adding effects, trimming, or adjusting levels, as it allows for precise editing of each individual track.
  • Suitable for low-latency audio: Since each audio file is processed independently, the latency (delay between input and output) is typically lower compared to multitrack workflows.

Disadvantages of Audio File Workflow:

  • Limited flexibility for mixing: Mixing multiple audio tracks using individual files can be cumbersome and require extensive file management.
  • Difficult for complex projects: For projects with a large number of tracks or complex mixing requirements, individual audio files may not be the most efficient approach.
  • Potential for synchronization issues: Aligning multiple audio tracks manually can be challenging, increasing the risk of synchronization errors.

Multitrack Session Workflow

In a multitrack session workflow, multiple audio tracks are combined and mixed within a single project file. This approach is well-suited for projects with multiple instruments, vocals, or other sound elements that require sophisticated mixing and arrangement. The workflow involves arranging, editing, and processing each track within the multitrack session.

Advantages of Multitrack Session Workflow:

  • Flexibility for mixing: Mixing multiple audio tracks within a single session allows for greater flexibility and control over the overall sound.
  • Suitable for complex projects: Multitrack sessions are well-equipped for handling large numbers of tracks and complex mixing requirements.
  • Efficient for synchronization: Multitrack sessions provide built-in tools for aligning and synchronizing multiple tracks, minimizing the risk of timing issues.

Disadvantages of Multitrack Session Workflow:

  • Initial setup and complexity: Creating a multitrack session requires setting up the track arrangement, which can be more complex compared to individual audio files.
  • Increased latency: Due to the processing of multiple tracks simultaneously, latency may be higher compared to audio file workflow.
  • Requires specialized software: Dedicated audio editing software is typically required for multitrack sessions, which may require additional investment or learning curve.

Choosing the Right Workflow

The choice between an audio file workflow and a multitrack session workflow depends on the specific project requirements. For simple projects with minimal mixing, individual audio files may suffice. However, for projects with complex audio setups, multiple instruments, or sophisticated mixing requirements, a multitrack session is often the better choice.

In general, a multitrack session workflow provides greater flexibility, control, and efficiency for mixing and arranging multiple audio tracks, making it ideal for professional-level productions. However, for quick edits, simple projects, or low-latency audio needs, an audio file workflow may be more suitable.

Try Adobe Audition with a 7-day free trial.